Contact Us

works@secondcity.com

Leave this empty:

  1. Your Name

    Your first name is required.
    Your last name is required.
  2. What Is Your Title?

  3. Where Do You Work?

    Your company name is required.
  4. Has a budget been established for this project?

    A budget status is required.
  5. How Can We Reach You?

    A valid email address is required.
  6. What else should we know?

Charlan Nemeth, UC Berkeley – “In Defense of Troublemakers”

Podcasts
Kelly cooks up trouble with professor Charlan Nemeth whose new book looks at the virtues of the outliers and misfits.

Read further for this week’s Rule of Three.

Second City Works “Getting to Yes, And” – Rule of Three

Charlan Nemeth is a professor at UC Berkeley whose new book “In Defense of Troublemakers” is an evidence-based look into how important dissent and dissenters are – whether we like it or not.

  • You posit in your book that dissent is good even if it’s wrong. How so?
  • “The whole point of the book is really not one of argument for argument’s sake or even dissent for dissent’s sake. It really has to do with when you have a differing opinion from the majority or from the consensus. Most people are afraid and they don’t speak up. Companies have that problem all the time. And the research really shows us that that even if it’s wrong, the fact that the majority or the consensus is challenged actually stimulates thinking that by and large improves decision making in creative problem solving. It basically just gets you to think in broader, more divergent ways. It’s a benefit regardless of whether or not they hold the truth or not.
  • Likewise, you talk about how prone we are to be in error by subscribing to the majority opinion.
  • “People will agree with an erroneous majority judgment even when it’s on physical facts. Early studies by Solomon Asch on a simple length of lines. Namely, if you’re making the judgements alone, you make no mistakes. These aren’t kind of ambiguous or tough problems. I mean, it’s just flat in front of your face. But what you find is that if you put as few as three people, all of whom agree on something that’s wrong, over 35 percent of the individuals will follow that judgment. They start to see a reality in a way that they would not, if they were making the judgment alone. And these are not judgments or things where there’s ambiguity and there’s five different ways of looking at it. This is a flat out ight physical judgment in front of you. So blue becomes green and what comes to mind is this notion of what’s fake and what’s true.”
  • And how can we protect ourselves from this particular bias?
  • “I think that that listening as if you’re wrong is an extremely important mindset.”
Tags
creativity,  diversity,  inclusion,  innovation,  leadership,  risk,  team building

Related

Creativity is a Scared Bunny. Be a Hero and Slay the Judgement Dragon.
Thoughts

Creativity is a Scared Bunny. Be a Hero and Slay the Judgement Dragon.

Learn More
How Can Comedy Help Biglaw With Issues Related to Gender, Diversity, and Inclusion?
News

How Can Comedy Help Biglaw With Issues Related to Gender, Diversity, and Inclusion?

Learn More
Is your company a hotbed of harassment?  Maybe; 3 Signs That Your Organization is in the Risky Zone.
Thoughts

Is your company a hotbed of harassment? Maybe; 3 Signs That Your Organization is in the Risky Zone.

Learn More